A business professional reviewing wire transfer documents and a contract at a desk, pen in hand.

Payment decision

Why 30/70 leaves you exposed

The default T/T split sends 70% of your money before the goods leave the factory. Here is the three-milestone structure that fixes it.

Last evidence review: October 2, 2026

Payment decisionT/T payment terms

Short answer

30/70 is the supplier's preferred structure, not the buyer's. In a standard 30/70 split, 70% of your money leaves before the goods are verifiably ready. The only leverage left is a legal claim in a jurisdiction you probably did not choose.30/40/30 fixes this by tying every release to a verifiable milestone:30% after factory verification, 40% after pre-shipment inspection (PSI) pass, 30% 30 days after arrival.

Three verifiable facts

Fact 1 — The 70% is released before the goods are verifiable

Source: Industry-standard T/T terms

Claim: In a 30/70 structure, the 70% balance is typically due “before shipment” or “against copy of B/L.” At that point, the buyer has not seen the finished goods and has no third-party verification.

How to verify: Ask your supplier for their standard PI terms. Check when the 70% is due relative to inspection and shipment milestones.

Fact 2 — A B/L copy is not proof of correct goods

Source: International shipping documentation standards

Claim: A bill of lading (B/L) proves the carrier received a container. It does not prove the contents match your specification, quantity, or quality. Paying against a B/L copy means you have paid in full before verifying what is inside.

How to verify: Read any B/L — it lists container number, weight, and destination. It does not list SKU-level contents or quality metrics.

Fact 3 — 30/40/30 is accepted by Chinese suppliers when framed correctly

Source: China Sourcing Decisions buyer-side negotiation practice

Claim: Suppliers resist 30/40/30 when it is presented as “we don't trust you.” They accept it when framed as “we both need a PSI pass before the 40% moves, and the 30% after arrival covers the risk of hidden defects.” The structure is identical to how domestic Chinese buyers protect themselves.

How to verify: No public database exists. This is a negotiation pattern observed across buyer-side sourcing work.

Negotiation pattern from buyer-side practice, not a platform-published rate. Confirm against your own supplier conversations.

The leverage questionWhoever holds the unpaid balance holds the leverage. 30/70 leaves the supplier holding none of your money at the moment the goods become visible — which is exactly when you need it.

The problem with 30/70

In a standard T/T 30/70, the payment timeline looks like this:

Milestone 1

30%

Deposit after signed PI

Milestone 2

70%

Due before shipment or against B/L copy

Buyer has not verified goods

Milestone 3

—

No post-arrival holdback

  • The 70% is typically due when the supplier says the goods are ready — but before you or a third party has inspected them.
  • Once the 70% is paid, the supplier has received 100% of the order value. Your remaining leverage is a legal claim under a contract that may not be enforceable in China, and almost certainly is not in your home country.
  • If defects are found after arrival, you have already paid in full. The supplier's incentive to cooperate drops sharply.

How 30/40/30 fixes it

The three-milestone structure keeps leverage on the buyer's side at every stage:

Milestone 1

30%

After signed PI + factory verification

Milestone 2

40%

After PSI pass or third-party inspection

Buyer verifies before paying

Milestone 3

30%

30 days after arrival

Hidden defect buffer

  • 30% — Deposit: Released after signed PI. For custom orders, add a factory-verification trigger (visit or video call) before this 30% moves.
  • 40% — Before shipment: Released only after a pre-shipment inspection (PSI) report shows the goods meet the PI specification. If the PSI fails, the 40% does not move until rework is complete and re-inspected.
  • 30% — 30 days after arrival: Released once the goods have arrived and any hidden defects would have become visible. This 30% is your leverage if the shipment does not match what the PSI approved.
Boundary check: The 30/40/30 structure assumes you have written inspection criteria in the PI before the deposit. Without written criteria, the PSI has nothing to measure against.

How to propose 30/40/30 to your supplier

Don't lead with “we don't trust you.” Lead with shared risk reduction:

  1. Frame it as quality assurance, not suspicion: “We both want to avoid disputes. A PSI pass before the 40% protects you from rework claims after shipment.”
  2. Reference domestic practice: “This is standard practice for domestic buyers in China. It is not unusual.”
  3. Offer something in return: If the supplier resists, offer a slightly higher total price or faster payment timing in exchange for the safer structure. The structure is worth more than the margin.
  4. Put it in the PI before the deposit: Do not negotiate payment terms after the deposit is paid. The PI is the only document the bank and any dispute platform will reference.

When 30/40/30 is not enough

  • Orders over $50,000: Consider a Letter of Credit (LC) or escrow arrangement. The 30/40/30 structure still leaves significant capital at risk before arrival.
  • First-time suppliers with no track record: Add a factory audit or video verification trigger before the 30% deposit.
  • Custom / OEM orders with high tooling cost: The 30% deposit may cover the entire tooling cost. If the tooling is wrong, the 30% is a total loss. Structure tooling payment separately with its own verification milestone.
  • Orders placed through a sourcing agent: Verify who holds the funds. If the agent holds the 40% between PSI and shipment, the agent becomes a counterparty risk. Seewho should hold your money.

Primary sources